Posts Tagged ‘reviews’
Don’t you love the titles of porn films? This film does involve bisexuality and scenes with a “her” and two “poles,” but there’s no sign of any manic-depressives.
Lukas is napping when Harek gets into his pants and starts stroking his cock. He soons starts sucking Lukas, and busty blonde Jana, who had been reading, joins in. Jana continues to suck Lukas as he leans over and sucks Harek.
Jana strips and gets in between the two guys, who both seem interested in her. As she sucks Lukas, Harek licks her pussy. The action is varied somewhat as the two guys kiss, but Harek continues to stroke her. Then the guys combine forces to give her a two-handed handjob to orgasm. I’ve never seen that before.
Jana gets on Lukas and rides him reverse cowgirl. Harek assists by alternately stroking her pussy and pulling out Lukas’ cock to suck it.
Then they form a tower of fucking. Jana rides Harek’s cock, as he rides Lukas’. After a while of that, Jana gets off to suck Harek’s cock.
Harek then fucks Jana from behind, as she sucks Lukas.
Lukas goes around to fuck Harek, who licks and fingers Jana to multiple (apparent) orgasms. For a gay guy — if he is gay — Harek sure seems to know his way around a woman’s body. I’ve never seen a straight or bi movie that gave so much attention to the woman’s orgasms. She then sucks both of them off.
Well, that’s just the first scene, but I’m exhausted. Maybe I’ll review the other two scenes another time.
Note: I’m not sure about the characters’ names. They’re not used in the video itself — the little dialog is a weird mix of German and German-accented English — I got them from reviews on the Web.
Two scenes (plus some advice): In each of them, two men make love to a woman (Nina herself in the first scene). The woman takes the guys in pretty much every way imaginable. It’s really hot, especially if you’re a woman who has this fantasy.
What doesn’t happen: The guys do not touch each other. This may be a relief to some, a disappointment to others.
When I heard that the January-February 2009 Playgirl would be its last printed issue, I had to get a copy. I was never keen on the mag, though. Like most women, I prefer some kind of story with my sexually explicit material, so I tend to go for either erotic fiction or porn videos with a plot. Nevertheless, I always thought it was kinda cool that there was this magazine with pictures of nude men aimed at women — the feminine answer to Playboy. So I wanted to see how the last issue of Playgirl compared with the ones I remembered giggling about (and lusting over) with my girlfriends.
The issue displays lots of nude men, as you would expect. Everywhere you look, your gaze meets penises, from flaccid to fully erect. (This was not always the case. For much of Playgirl‘s history, erections were taboo, and for one forlorn year in the 1980s, the magazine was completely dickless.) There’s a pictorial of a man and a woman, both nude and doing everything but actually having sex. However — and this is a big defect — the guys are just not as drop-dead gorgeous as I remember them being. Compare last coverboy Sean Patrick in the accompanying image, who appears nude in the magazine, with 1986 Man of the Year Brian Buzzini (turn off “Safe Search” to get the best view; yes, you can even find the famous centerfold of Brian Buzzini sporting a lovely erection).
After you get done gazing at the nude men, what else is there to see? There’s a sweet farewell letter from editor Nicole Caldwell to the “fierce Playgirl posse, sharing a common commitment to unearth the world’s most beautiful men, and dishing about issues women like us deal with every day.” Women write about their experiences having sex in Second Life and having sex with strap-ons. There are more serious articles about genital mutilation and prostitution in Amsterdam. There’s some all-too-short erotic fiction. There are some travel articles and movie reviews. Again, it’s all a pale reflection of the old Playgirl.
The magazine has always been marketed as “entertainment for women.” In recent years, editors have admitted that at least 50% of the Playgirl‘s readers were men. The advertising seems to have caught up with that. On just the first few pages, there are ads for toys in which to insert one’s dick, creams to enlarge one’s dick, and just plain lots of dicks (“the world’s largest gay porn portal”). It doesn’t seem like the haven for female sexuality it once was.
The Future of Playgirl
Playgirl lives on as a Web site and producer of erotic videos aimed at women. It’s not the same as having a nudie magazine out there, just for us. The magazine was never as widely distributed as its male counterpart, so you may have to look around to find that last issue, and in any case, it will soon disappear from newsstands altogether. (It’s already selling on some collectors’ sites for $25.)
More about Playgirl
- Goodnight, Sweet Hunks: A Former Editor Offers a Playgirl Postmortem, Radar, Aug. 4, 2008
- They Couldn’t Get Past the ‘Mimbos’ by Cara Buckley, New York Times, Nov. 16, 2008
- R.I.P. Playgirl by Tracy Clark-Flory, Salon.com, Nov. 17, 2008
- Playgirl’s Queer Canard by Judy Cole, Nerve.com, 1997